On the command line (Usually Linux): 7z a -v2g -t7z -m0=lzma -mx=9 -mfb=64 -md=32m -ms=off archive. Then, to compress the tar file (or one file as in your use case) you may use 7z: To store one or many files you can build a tar file with all the permissions, ACLs and time tags you may need from Linux, MacOS and/or Windows (10). Use FAT (aka vFAT) as it could be read (and correctly written) in all important OSes, and,īuild a compressed archive of all the files to transfer divided into volumes smaller than 2GiB. What I recommend you is to decouple the issue of file size from the file system. This system has many features which help quickly recover errors if your computer crashes, shadow copies for backups. NTFS: Advantage: Like ExFAT, NTFS can also support files larger than 4GB. Posted: (1 day ago) NTFS vs ExFAT for a non-system SSD of 3 1 2 3 Last. Verdict: ExFAT is best suited for users who are going to deal with files larger than 4GB in size, and who do not use older Mac or Windows operating systems. But for Windows use, probably, NTFS is a better fit. NTFS vs ExFAT for a non-system SSD - Windows 10 Forums Discover The Best Images Images. My personal opinion is that ext4 is more useful than NTFS for use in Linux. The correct answer to that question is long, complex, and usually ends up including several personal opinions. Is there any benefit to using ext4 instead of NTFS?
The question you are making is related to file systems:
